Click-to-pin on any element
They point at the thing. The pin belongs to that element, not to a vague spot somewhere on a screenshot.
Visual feedback for people who don't file tickets
Blipmark is a 10KB widget you drop into any site. Your client clicks whatever's wrong and says what's wrong with it. You get the screenshot, the selector, the breakpoint and the path they walked to get there — and they never have to make an account, learn a tool, or be told what a console is.
01 — Have a go
Not a video, not a screenshot of a video. The real interaction, running here on a pretend client site. Nothing you do leaves this page.
Baked at four in the morning and out of the door by noon. We keep a list for the loaves that never make it as far as the shelf.
Order a loafCollection only. Wednesdays we are shut, and we are not sorry about it.
All of that is the real behaviour: select mode, the pin, the breakpoint stamp, the thread, the unread dot, and the reporter's own done and delete. The only thing missing is your site.
02 — Why this exists
Your client is describing a page they can see and you can't. That's the whole problem, and it isn't fixed by asking them to be more technical. It's fixed by letting them point.
The button disappears when I scroll — I only ever see half of it.
03 — What's in it
Blipmark does one job. Everything below is here because a QA round falls apart without it — nothing is here to fill out a comparison table.
They point at the thing. The pin belongs to that element, not to a vague spot somewhere on a screenshot.
Captured automatically at the moment they complain: exactly what was on their screen, not what's on yours now.
A pin left at 390px arrives labelled mobile. It settles "works on my machine" before anyone says it.
Reply where the report lives. They read it in the widget; a blue dot tells you who is still waiting on you.
The pages they walked before they hit the problem. Half your reproduction steps, already written down.
Per project, sequential: #1, #2, #3. "Have you seen twelve yet?" is a sentence that works on a call.
The team sees every report. Each reporter sees only theirs — so two clients on one site never read each other's notes.
When the reporter agrees it's fixed, they mark it done themselves — or delete it once they realise it was their cache.
It runs on your server, beside whatever else is on there. Screenshots of a client's unreleased work stay on hardware you rent.
04 — Two people, two views
05 — The arithmetic
Nobody minds paying for software. What grates is paying every month, per seat, forever, for something you could host beside your own staging site — and handing a client's unreleased screenshots to someone else's database while you're at it.
Seat-based SaaS
$480 / year
$40 a month. Every month. Project or no project.
Blipmark
Your VPS
The one you already pay for. A cheap box runs it comfortably.
06 — Getting it running
If you've deployed anything to a VPS before, you already know how to do this. If you haven't, this is a very reasonable first thing to deploy.
Blipmark is a small self-contained app. Point it at a domain you control — feedback.yourstudio.com is the usual shape — and let it share a box with your staging sites. It is not a hungry thing.
One project per client site. Each gets its own key and its own #1, so bug numbers never collide between clients.
<script
src="https://feedback.yourstudio.com/widget.js"
data-project="northwind"
defer></script>Tell them: open the site, click the little circle, click the thing that's wrong, type what's wrong with it. There is no second sentence. You'll spend longer writing the email than they'll spend learning it.
07 — The things you were about to ask
Really. They give an email address once, so the thread has somewhere to go and so you know who said it. No password, no confirmation link, no seat on anybody's plan.
That's the case it's built for. They never see a selector, a breakpoint or a URL — the widget collects all of that quietly while they type one sentence in plain language. The technical part lands on your side, which is the only side where it's useful.
It's a 10KB script, loaded with defer. Until somebody clicks the launcher it renders nothing and takes no screenshot.
Onto your server, into your database. That is the whole point of the self-hosted part: nothing about a client's unreleased site passes through anyone else on the way.
No. Visibility is role-based — your team sees everything, and each reporter sees only their own reports with your replies. Two clients on one project stay in separate lanes without you configuring anything.
Yes, and they should. They're the one who can see whether it's genuinely fixed on their phone. They can mark their own items done, or delete them outright when it turns out the page just needed a reload.
You can spend it asking which button, or you can spend it fixing the button. The widget takes an afternoon to stand up and pays for itself the first time a client sends you a pin instead of a paragraph.